With SPGMI\u2019s monthly GDP, we have the following picture of series the NBER Business Cycle Dating Committee focuses on:<\/p>\n
Figure 1:<\/strong> Nonfarm Payroll incl benchmark revision employment from CES (bold blue), civilian employment using smoothed population controls (orange), industrial production (red), personal income excluding current transfers in Ch.2017$ (bold light green), manufacturing and trade sales in Ch.2017$ (black), consumption in Ch.2017$ (light blue), and monthly GDP in Ch.2017$ (pink), GDP (blue bars), all log normalized to 2021M11=0. 2025Q1 GDP is second release. Source: BLS via FRED, Federal Reserve, BEA, S&P Global Market Insights<\/a> (nee Macroeconomic Advisers, IHS Markit) (6\/2\/<\/em>2025 release), and author\u2019s calculations.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n Some alternative indicators are shown in Figure 2.<\/p>\n Figure 2:<\/strong> Preliminary Nonfarm Payroll early benchmark (NFP) (bold blue), civilian employment adjusted to NFP concept, with smoothed population controls (orange), manufacturing production (red), real retail sales (black), and coincident index in Ch.2017$ (pink), GDO (blue bars), all log normalized to 2021M11=0. Source: Philadelphia Fed [1]<\/a>,\u00a0Philadelphia Fed [2]<\/a>, Federal Reserve via FRED, BEA 2025Q1 second release,<\/em>\u00a0and author\u2019s calculations.<\/em><\/p>\n Monthly GDP, civilian employment, civilian employment adjusted to NFP concept, manufacturing production, and retail sales all fell in latest month available. Given the high levels of sampling uncertainty, I would put little weight on the household survey based series. Nonetheless, there are many series that are \u201cflat-ish\u201d. Consumption rose in April, but at a slowing pace.<\/p>\n Interestingly, the Philly Fed\u2019s coincident index \u2014 which is supposed to track GDP \u2014 has deviated substantially from monthly GDP (10.4% vs. 6.9%) This is likely due to its reliance on labor market data, which has remained remarkably resilient.<\/p>\n High frequency (weekly) Lewis-Mertens-Stock index has decelerated into early June, as discussed in this post<\/a>.<\/p>\n Figure 3:<\/strong>\u00a0Lewis, Mertens, Stock Weekly Economic Index (blue), and Baumeister, Leiva-Leon, Sims Weekly Economic Conditions Index for US plus 2% trend (tan), all y\/y growth rate in %. Source: Dallas Fed via\u00a0FRED<\/a>,\u00a0WECI<\/a>, accessed 6\/12\/2025.<\/em><\/p>\n PMI new orders suggest a slowdown as well, with both sectors registering less than 50.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/recindic_jun25.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n