![\"\"](\"https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/05143731\/SEI_232064178.jpg\")
<\/div>A highly infectious strain of bird flu has been circulating worldwide since 2020<\/p>\n
ULISES RUIZ\/AFP via Getty Images<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n
The H5N1 bird flu<\/a> virus that has spread worldwide is already better at infecting people<\/a> than earlier strains. What\u2019s more, a single mutation could allow it to infect the cells lining our noses and throats, making it more likely to go airborne.<\/p>\n This change alone is not enough for the virus to be capable of causing a pandemic. However, if a virus with this mutation swapped genes with a human flu virus, it could acquire pandemic potential almost instantly.<\/p>\n \u201cThe more people get infected, the more likely it is that something like this could arise,\u201d says Ian Wilson<\/a> at the Scripps Research Institute in California. Despite this, Wilson thinks the risk remains low.<\/p>\n A particularly virulent form of H5N1 bird flu evolved in the 1990s, probably in domestic birds in China, and spread worldwide. Around 2020, a new variant of this virus emerged and spread even more widely, reaching the Americas and Antarctica<\/a>. It has infected domestic poultry in large numbers and is also spreading among dairy cows in the US,<\/a> causing occasional human cases.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n A team led by Debby van Riel<\/a> at the Erasmus University Medical Center in the Netherlands has now infected human nose and throat cells with H5N1 variants from 2005 and 2022. They have shown for the first time that the 2022 variant is better at binding to these cells and also better at replicating inside them. \u201cIt\u2019s bad news,\u201d says van Riel.<\/p>\n \u201cI don\u2019t think the chances of the virus becoming pandemic are extremely high,\u201d she says. But the fact that the virus is better at infecting humans will give it more opportunities to acquire additional mutations that increase its pandemic potential.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, Wilson and his colleagues have been studying the crucial haemagglutinin protein of the flu virus. This protein binds to receptors on the outside of cells, determining which cells the virus can infect. Because it protrudes from the virus, it is also the main target of the immune system.<\/p>\n At present, the H5N1 haemagglutinin binds mainly to receptors that in humans are found deep in the lungs. This means it can cause severe disease but it is unlikely to get out of the body and infect others. To do that, the virus needs to infect cells lining the nose and throat, meaning viruses can be coughed or sneezed out to infect others.<\/p>\n Van Riel\u2019s study suggests the virus can do this to some degree, but it\u2019s not clear whether the virus is binding to the main receptors on these cells. It was thought that multiple mutations would be required for H5N1 to bind strongly to these receptors, but Wilson\u2019s team has now shown that with the current H5N1 variant, a single mutation is all it would take.<\/p>\n This change alone would not result in a virus capable of going pandemic, says team member Jim Paulson<\/a>, also at the Scripps Research Institute. \u201cWe view this property as required \u2013 but importantly not sufficient \u2013 for transmission, for a pandemic virus,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n Other changes are also necessary for the virus to start to replicate and spread from person to person, says Paulson, and these are not well understood. \u201cThere\u2019s a lot of biology that we don\u2019t even know,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n Once an H5N1 virus infecting a human acquired the receptor-switching mutation, however, it would then have a chance of evolving these other changes as well.<\/p>\n What\u2019s more, in theory, it could acquire all the abilities it needs in one fell swoop by swapping genes with a human virus infecting the same individual. Several previous flu pandemics were caused by animal and human flu viruses swapping genes<\/a>, says Paulson.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is highly concerning,\u201d says Aris Katzourakis<\/a> at the University of Oxford, who was not involved in either study. \u201cEach spillover to a human gives the virus a roll of the dice.\u201d<\/p>\n If H5N1 bird flu does manage to start spreading from person to person, the big question is how deadly it would be. Of the people confirmed to be infected with the virus since 2003, half have died. However, the true infection fatality rate could be lower as many cases have probably gone undetected, and milder ones are more likely to be missed<\/a>.<\/p>\n Among the 60 or so people infected in the US since the dairy outbreak began, almost all have had mild symptoms only. Why is not understood<\/a>, but one explanation is that many were infected via the eyes. \u201cThat is known to have far milder outcomes,\u201d says Katzourakis.<\/p>\n It is also thought that when viruses switch from binding to receptors deep in the lungs to those higher in the respiratory tract, they become less dangerous. But the puzzling aspects of the cases in the US have left Paulson unsure that this will hold true with H5N1. \u201cNow I just don\u2019t know what to think, to be honest,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n \u201cI don\u2019t think there is any reason to be complacent in this respect, and anticipate \u2018mildness\u2019 should this virus become readily human-to-human transmissible,\u201d says Katzourakis.<\/p>\n Wilson\u2019s team studied the haemagglutinin protein in isolation, so there was no chance of a lab leak of the mutant protein. \u201cThere was no virus used at all here,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n Topics:<\/p>\n<\/section><\/div>\nHow deadly would an H5N1 pandemic be?<\/h2>\n