{"id":259770,"date":"2024-09-15T21:51:11","date_gmt":"2024-09-15T21:51:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/2024\/09\/15\/ft-booth-survey-of-macroeconomists-whose-platform-is-more-inflationary-deficit-expanding\/"},"modified":"2025-06-25T17:11:19","modified_gmt":"2025-06-25T17:11:19","slug":"ft-booth-survey-of-macroeconomists-whose-platform-is-more-inflationary-deficit-expanding","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/2024\/09\/15\/ft-booth-survey-of-macroeconomists-whose-platform-is-more-inflationary-deficit-expanding\/","title":{"rendered":"FT-Booth Survey of Macroeconomists: Whose Platform Is More Inflationary\/Deficit Expanding?"},"content":{"rendered":"

[ad_1]
\n<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n
\n

From the September survey, as shown in yesterday\u2019s FT<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Source:<\/strong> C. Smith, <\/a><\/em>FT<\/a>, 14 Sep 2024<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

It\u2019s amazing to me that there\u2019re 3% of respondents that say the Harris platform is more inflationary. Of course, with 37 respondents, that\u2019s one economist. Almost as surprising is that 11% (3 respondents) say the Harris platform would induce larger deficits.<\/p>\n

Forecasts of GDP from the survey are discussed in this post<\/a>. Survey results are here<\/a> (ungated).<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n