[ad_1]
\n<\/p>\n
Time<\/em> has <\/a> a growing number of publications to sign a licensing deal with <\/a>. The <\/a> creator will legally be able to train its large language models on 101 years worth of the storied publication’s journalism, as <\/em><\/a> first reported.<\/p>\n OpenAI will also have access to real-time content from Time<\/em>, with the apparent aim of answering user queries about breaking news. In return, OpenAI will cite Time<\/em> and link back to source material on the publication’s website.<\/p>\n Perhaps Time<\/em> will get a monetary kickback too, like other publishers that have <\/a> with a ragged cap in hand and an eye on one a new revenue source for struggling media companies. The Atlantic<\/em>, Vox Media, Wall Street Journal<\/em> publisher <\/a>, the <\/em><\/a>, People<\/em> magazine <\/a> and <\/a> have also been enticed by some Time<\/em> says the agreement builds on its “commitment to expanding global access to accurate and trusted information.” It dropped its website paywall last year for the same reason.<\/p>\n The magazine, which is now published on a biweekly basis after being <\/a> by the impact of the internet on print advertising, says it will have access to OpenAI’s tech to “develop new products for its audiences.” Time<\/em> will also “provide vital feedback and share practical applications to refine and enhance the delivery of journalism in ChatGPT and other OpenAI products and shape the future of news experiences.”<\/p>\n Some notable publishers have so far refused to bend the knee to OpenAI. <\/em><\/a>, the\u00a0<\/em><\/em><\/a> have sued the company and its partner Microsoft for copyright infringement, alleging that they trained AI chatbots on those publications’ work without permission.<\/p>\n This article contains affiliate links; if you click such a link and make a purchase, we may earn a commission.<\/p>\n<\/div>\nsnake oil<\/del> bank deposits from OpenAI.<\/p>\n