{"id":231516,"date":"2024-06-12T18:18:46","date_gmt":"2024-06-12T18:18:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/2024\/06\/12\/year-on-year-and-instantaneous-inflation-in-may-food-prices-declining\/"},"modified":"2025-06-25T17:17:16","modified_gmt":"2025-06-25T17:17:16","slug":"year-on-year-and-instantaneous-inflation-in-may-food-prices-declining","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/2024\/06\/12\/year-on-year-and-instantaneous-inflation-in-may-food-prices-declining\/","title":{"rendered":"Year-on-Year and Instantaneous Inflation in May; Food Prices Declining"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> [ad_1]<br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Headline and core surprise on the downside: m\/m 0.2% vs. 0.3% consensus, and 0.0% vs 0.1% consensus, respectively. More interestingly, Cleveland Fed core CPI nowcast for May m\/m was 0.30%, actual was 0.16%.<\/p>\n<p>First, a comparison of different measures of headline \u2013 y\/y, instantaneous, m\/m:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24.png\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-52531\" src=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"849\" height=\"561\" srcset=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24.png 849w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24-300x198.png 300w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24-768x507.png 768w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24-624x412.png 624w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 849px) 100vw, 849px\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Figure 1: Year-on-Year CPI inflation (bold black), i<\/strong>nstantaneous inflation (T=12, a=4) per\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4554153\">Eeckhout (2023)<\/a> for CPI (tan), month-on-month (green), Source: BLS via FRED, and author\u2019s calculations.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Instantaneous inflation declines to 1.8%, which is below the 2.45% CPI inflation consistent with a 2% PCE inflation.<\/p>\n<p>What about core and supercore measures?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24b.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-52532\" src=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24b.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"835\" height=\"561\" srcset=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24b.png 835w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24b-300x202.png 300w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24b-768x516.png 768w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24b-624x419.png 624w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 835px) 100vw, 835px\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Figure 2:<\/strong>\u00a0Instantaneous inflation (T=12, a=4) per\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4554153\">Eeckhout (2023)<\/a> for core CPI (blue), chained core CPI, seasonally adjusted by author using X-13 (tan), PCE deflator (pink), CPI supercore (teal). Implied CPI target incorporates the 0.45 ppts CPI-PCE differential over the 1986-2024 period. Source: BLS, BEA via FRED, <a href=\"https:\/\/beta.bls.gov\/dataViewer\/view\/timeseries\/CUSR0000SA0L12E4#\">BLS<\/a>, and author\u2019s calculations.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In addition to the positive information in the CPI measures, food prices continue to decline.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24c.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-52533\" src=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24c.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"835\" height=\"561\" srcset=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24c.png 835w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24c-300x202.png 300w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24c-768x516.png 768w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24c-624x419.png 624w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 835px) 100vw, 835px\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Figure 3:<\/strong> CPI component \u2013 food at home (blue), and Chained CPI component \u2013 food at home, seasonally adjusted by X-13 by author (tan), both in logs 2021M01=0. Source: BLS and author\u2019s calculations.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In other words, while official year-on-year food at home inflation is 1.04%, instantaneous is -0.2% (q\/q is -0.8% annualized), and chained (seasonally adjusted by author) is -0.7%.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24d.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-52535\" src=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24d.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"849\" height=\"561\" srcset=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24d.png 849w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24d-300x198.png 300w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24d-768x507.png 768w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/inflpix_may24d-624x412.png 624w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 849px) 100vw, 849px\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Figure 4:<\/strong> Instantaneous inflation rate (T=12, a=4) per\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4554153\">Eeckhout (2023)<\/a> for food at home (blue), and chained, seasonally adjusted by X-13 by author (tan). Source: BLS and author\u2019s calculations.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>[ad_2]<br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/archives\/2024\/06\/year-on-year-and-instantaneous-inflation-in-may-food-prices-declining\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[ad_1] Headline and core surprise on the downside: m\/m 0.2% vs. 0.3% consensus, and 0.0% vs 0.1% consensus, respectively. More interestingly, Cleveland Fed core CPI<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":231517,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[155],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231516"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=231516"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231516\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/231517"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=231516"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=231516"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=231516"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}