Like its siblings, the Samsung Galaxy M35<\/a> failed to impress voters in last week\u2019s poll<\/a>. Most say that there are better mid-rangers out there, which are more deserving of their money. And that includes the Galaxy A35.<\/p>\n We thought that the larger 6,000mAh battery (1,000mAh above the A35 battery capacity) might give the M-phone a leg up. However, devices like the Galaxy M51 and M62 had 7,000mAh in their tanks, so the M35 is not impressive among its older peers.<\/p>\n Some took issue with the slow 25W charging \u2013 that\u2019s as fast as the premium Galaxy S24, though there it only has a 4,000mAh battery to fill. Pricing is a bit of an issue, but it\u2019s mostly the strong competition from other mid-rangers that holds the M35 back.<\/p>\n As mentioned, some are looking at the Galaxy A35. Someone in the comments mentioned the Galaxy M55, which can be a great deal (depending on where you live). And, of course, there were plenty of non-Samsung suggestions too.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n![\"Weekly](\"https:\/\/fdn.gsmarena.com\/imgroot\/news\/24\/06\/weekly-poll-results-samsung-galaxy-m35\/inline\/gsmarena_001.png\")
<\/p>\n