Does antisemitism have roots in Islam? In the 900th<\/sup> edition of Merkur<\/em>, Manfred Sing looks at the historical evidence and unequivocally says no. Claims to the contrary are refuted by the long history of peaceful coexistence between Jews and Muslims in the Middle East \u2013 a history that only came to an end in the first half of the 20th<\/sup> century.<\/p>\n By contrast, European Jews were discriminated against, disenfranchised and expelled from their home countries since Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire. Anti-Jewish pogroms are a European phenomenon. While massacres and expulsions targeting Jews in the Muslim world did occur occasionally over the centuries, all were local outliers motivated by political rather than religious or ethnic conflict.<\/p>\n Sing looks, for instance, at the notorious case of Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who collaborated with the Nazis. Al-Husseini\u2019s instigation of the Nabi Musa riots in Palestine in 1920 and the first pogrom against Iraqi Jews in 1941 should be seen in the context of burgeoning Palestinian nationalism and its attendant anti-Zionism, and not in terms of the Islamic faith.<\/p>\n Attempts by Hamas and other groups to cast the Prophet himself as a hater of Jews, and the eradication of Jews from the earth as a Muslim imperative, are politically motivated distortions that misrepresent both Muslim and European-Christian history. It is a myth that serves not just the supporters of Islamist violence, but also the apologists of Israel\u2019s war against Gaza.<\/p>\n Historian Claudia Gatzka observes how, both in contemporary polemics as well as scholarship, the emergence of dictatorships is frequently treated as following natural laws. A dictatorship appears as inevitable if certain conditions pertain, such as crises, wars, or revolutions. As a result, the historical resilience of democracies disappears from view, as does the question of political agency. The interwar years are a good example of this.<\/p>\n The \u2018dictatorship\u2019 label also obscures the assumption of the superiority of liberal democracy. The spectre of dictatorship, whether raised by the left or the right, draws its power from the threat to the \u2018normality\u2019 of democracy. But rather than two clearly distinct systems, one good and one bad, societies are more accurately described as a mixture of democratic and dictatorial elements.<\/p>\n Everyone from reactionaries hostile to a diverse society to representatives of the state in western nations tends to operate with implicit definitions that produce ideologically weighted, neat categories. The confusion that this produces \u2013 such as when it is claimed that our liberal democracies are dictatorships in disguise \u2013 can be, and is, used to foment destabilization.<\/p>\n At the same time, this confusion reflects the reality that things are not clear-cut. Some contemporary historical scholarship is fruitfully blurring the lines between democracy and dictatorship by looking at the lives and perceptions of people living under various systems. This approach, argues Gatzka, can help better understand how tendencies toward more or less freedom are encouraged or thwarted.<\/p>\n Almost forty years after his last appearance in Merkur<\/em>, 80s\/90s cult author Rainald Goetz (<\/em>Irre<\/em>, Krieg<\/em>, Rave<\/em>) returns with excerpts from his \u2018work journal \u2013 spring and fall 2019\u2019. Referencing writers and artists from the 17th<\/sup> century to the present who work with the autobiographical form, Goetz in these fragmentary notes seeks to find an ethical position on writing about one\u2019s own life and the real people in it. Early on, he writes: \u2018Ruthlessness is not a concept of truth; and being excessively explicit about one\u2019s own drives \u2026 is not a good method for understanding oneself and the lot in life one has drawn.\u2019<\/p>\n Goetz faults his mentor, the author Michael Rutschky, for confusing scathing attacks and an attitude of cool detachment with a commitment to authenticity. It is rather benevolence, generosity, and a respect for what cannot and should not be said that drives good art \u2013 art of the kind that opens up our perspective on the world and ourselves, rather than closing it down in unrelenting and self-assured judgment.<\/p>\n Goetz\u2019s other recurring concern in these excerpts is ageing. How does the artist handle the decline in the spontaneous freedom of spirit one has as a young person? It takes work and effort to maintain the joy and curiosity in the other that is necessary for understanding and creativity, he writes. The ageing artist must reject the posture of masterfulness and allow themselves to continue to be affected, unsettled and bewildered by the world.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.eurozine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/merkur05_24-1024x768.jpg\")
<\/p>\nDictatorships and democracies<\/h2>\n
Goetz on ageing<\/h2>\n