{"id":222571,"date":"2024-04-10T22:33:12","date_gmt":"2024-04-10T22:33:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/2024\/04\/10\/inflation-surprise-econbrowser\/"},"modified":"2025-06-25T17:18:51","modified_gmt":"2025-06-25T17:18:51","slug":"inflation-surprise-econbrowser","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/2024\/04\/10\/inflation-surprise-econbrowser\/","title":{"rendered":"Inflation Surprise! | Econbrowser"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> [ad_1]<br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Here\u2019s a graphic depiction of the extent of the surprise, in levels, relative to Bloomberg Consensus and Cleveland Fed nowcasts.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24.png\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-51796\" src=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"864\" height=\"561\" srcset=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24.png 864w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24-300x195.png 300w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24-768x499.png 768w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24-624x405.png 624w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 864px) 100vw, 864px\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Figure 1:<\/strong> CPI (black), Bloomberg consensus (tan square), Cleveland Fed nowcast (sky blue inverted triangle), all on log scale. Source: BLS via FRED, Bloomberg,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.clevelandfed.org\/indicators-and-data\/inflation-nowcasting\"> Cleveland Fed<\/a>, and author\u2019s calculations.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24a.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-51797\" src=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24a.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"864\" height=\"561\" srcset=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24a.png 864w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24a-300x195.png 300w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24a-768x499.png 768w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24a-624x405.png 624w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 864px) 100vw, 864px\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Figure 2:<\/strong> Core CPI (black), Bloomberg consensus (tan square), Cleveland Fed nowcast (sky blue inverted triangle), all on log scale. Source: BLS via FRED, Bloomberg,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.clevelandfed.org\/indicators-and-data\/inflation-nowcasting\"> Cleveland Fed<\/a>, and author\u2019s calculations.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s what \u201ctrend\u201d inflation measures look like, in particular instantaneous inflation (T=12, a=4) per <a href=\"https:\/\/www.janeeckhout.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Instantaneous_Inflation.pdf\">Eeckhout (2023)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24b.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-51798\" src=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24b.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"835\" height=\"561\" srcset=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24b.png 835w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24b-300x202.png 300w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24b-768x516.png 768w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24b-624x419.png 624w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 835px) 100vw, 835px\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Figure 3:<\/strong> Instantaneous CPI inflation (bold black), instantaneous core CPI inflation (sky blue), trimmed mean inflation m\/m annualized (red), median inflation m\/m annualized (pink), and CPI supercore m\/m annualized (green). Instantaneous inflation calculated per <a href=\"https:\/\/www.janeeckhout.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Instantaneous_Inflation.pdf\">Eeckhout (2023)<\/a>, for T=12, a=4. Source: BLS, Dallas Fed via FRED, <a href=\"https:\/\/beta.bls.gov\/dataViewer\/view\/timeseries\/CUSR0000SA0L12E4;jsessionid=DB8367C15A29CBB8D0AC3E833E2751F9\">BLS<\/a>, and author\u2019s calculations.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Recall, the Fed doesn\u2019t target the CPI explicitly, but the PCE deflator (headline, according to text, but in practice it seems everybody uses core). But clearly information from the CPI is relevant to the PCE deflator. The Cleveland Fed nowcast utility shows how the PCE deflator nowcasts are affected.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/clevelandfedcpinowcast_10apr24.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-51799\" src=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/clevelandfedcpinowcast_10apr24.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"687\" height=\"610\" srcset=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/clevelandfedcpinowcast_10apr24.png 687w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/clevelandfedcpinowcast_10apr24-300x266.png 300w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/clevelandfedcpinowcast_10apr24-624x554.png 624w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 687px) 100vw, 687px\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Source:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/beta.bls.gov\/dataViewer\/view\/timeseries\/CUSR0000SA0L12E4;jsessionid=DB8367C15A29CBB8D0AC3E833E2751F9\">Cleveland Fed<\/a>, accessed 4\/10\/2024.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>While y\/y core PCE inflation would be decreasing with the pre- and post-CPI release nowcasts, the q\/q\u00a0 core PCE inflation would now be rising instead of stabilizing.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24d.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-51801\" src=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24d.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"835\" height=\"561\" srcset=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24d.png 835w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24d-300x202.png 300w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24d-768x516.png 768w, https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/cpipix_mar24d-624x419.png 624w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 835px) 100vw, 835px\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Figure 4:<\/strong> Core PCE quarter-on-quarter annualized inflation (bold black), and nowcast as of 3\/10 (sky blue inverted triangle), and as of 3\/9 (light green square), all in %. Source: BEA, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.clevelandfed.org\/indicators-and-data\/inflation-nowcasting\">Cleveland Fed<\/a>, and author\u2019s calculations.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Modal forecast from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cmegroup.com\/markets\/interest-rates\/cme-fedwatch-tool.html\">CME<\/a> for the June 12th meeting was for a drop by 25 bps (56%); post-CPI release, it\u2019s a no-change (81%). The expected value was 5.23% pre-release, and 5.33% post-release.<\/p>\n<p>CEA\u2019s take, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/WhiteHouseCEA\/status\/1778045835135078431\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><script async src=\"\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><br \/>\n<br \/>[ad_2]<br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/econbrowser.com\/archives\/2024\/04\/inflation-surprise\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[ad_1] Here\u2019s a graphic depiction of the extent of the surprise, in levels, relative to Bloomberg Consensus and Cleveland Fed nowcasts. Figure 1: CPI (black),<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":222572,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[155],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222571"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222571"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222571\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222572"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222571"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222571"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222571"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}