\n
![](\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/img-assets\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/gary-gensler-uniswap-e1712772243344.jpg?w=2048\")
<\/p>\n [ad_1]
\n<\/p>\n
The Securities and Exchange Commission warned Uniswap<\/a> on Wednesday that it intends to bring an enforcement action against the company, which is the leading platform for DeFi<\/a>\u2014a segment of the crypto market where traders rely on computer protocols that act as automated market makers for exchanging various tokens.<\/p>\n The warning came in the form of a so-called Wells Notice, which the SEC sends to a company prior to launching a formal lawsuit and which provides it a final opportunity to rebut any allegations. In this case, that process is likely to prove little more than a formality as the agency has reportedly been investigating Uniswap for some time, and is in the midst of a sweeping crackdown of the crypto industry.<\/p>\n When reached for comment, an agency spokesperson said: \u201cThe SEC does not comment on the existence or nonexistence of a possible investigation.\u201d<\/p>\n Fortune<\/em> has yet to learn the specific nature of the SEC\u2019s allegations against Uniswap Labs\u2014the company that built the protocol of the same name but does not control it. But based on the agency\u2019s recent lawsuits against high-profile crypto firms like Coinbase<\/a>, the agency is likely to claim the firm illegally offered unregistered securities to the public or that it failed to register as a broker or an exchange.<\/p>\n The impending Uniswap lawsuit comes at a time when the crypto industry has loudly complained the SEC has been operating in bad faith when it comes to the sector, pursuing enforcement actions despite clear rules while failing to account for crypto\u2019s distinct blockchain-based technology. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler<\/a> has shot back that existing securities laws are clear, and that the crypto sector has sought special treatment while failing to comply\u2014a position echoed by the White House and, especially, by Gensler\u2019s powerful ally, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).<\/p>\n The conflict between the SEC and the crypto industry has already led to a number of high-profile lawsuits, mostly notably ones involving Coinbase<\/a> and Ripple<\/a>, that turn on the SEC\u2019s jurisdiction over digital assets and on how a 1946 Supreme Court test that defines securities should apply to crypto.<\/p>\n Those lawsuits, which are ongoing, have produced mixed results that have allowed both sides to claim the upper hand, though the most recent ruling suggest the legal momentum lies with the SEC. The outcome of the Uniswap case, however, is especially unpredictable given the unique nature of DeFi technology and a notable legal victory for the company last year in a class-action suit.<\/p>\n The stakes of any lawsuit between the SEC and Uniswap Labs will be high given that DeFi, once a tiny niche of the crypto market, has grown rapidly. Uniswap recently announced that the protocol has facilitated over $2 trillion in transactions, and there is growing interest from mainstream finance about the potential of the underlying technology.<\/p>\n Unliked conventional brokerages or crypto exchanges, DeFi platforms don\u2019t have a central authority that serves as a counterparty for trades, or that sits between buyers and sellers. Instead, they rely on automated protocols overseen purely by code that set rules for trading, collateral requirements, and so on.<\/p>\n In the case of Uniswap Labs, founder Hayden Adams wrote the original underlying code that powers the protocol, and the company provides an interface for users to trade certain crypto tokens. But the protocol itself is open source and used by many other projects in the DeFi world.<\/p>\n This distinction was critical in resolving a class-action suit filed against Uniswap Labs last year that claimed the company was responsible for traders who had been scammed. In that case, the plaintiffs argued that Adams had built the equivalent of a dangerous self-driving car that was running amok.<\/p>\n Uniswap Labs took up the self-driving car metaphor as well, but argued that the technology it had built was neutral\u2014and that whether individuals used it for bad or for good was beyond its control. In a sophisticated ruling that described the nuances of DeFi in detail, a federal judge sided cleanly<\/a> with Uniswap Labs, handling the DeFi sector a major victory.<\/p>\n More recently, in a ruling last month<\/a> in the SEC\u2019s lawsuit against Coinbase, the judge refused to throw out claims the company was offering illegal securities\u2014but did rule that Coinbase\u2019s decentralized wallet offering could not be considered a broker for purposes of the SEC\u2019s authority. This finding is likely to boost Uniswap Labs\u2019s case in any lawsuit with the SEC, though it does not account for the company\u2019s interface over which the company has control and that has, in the past, highlighted tokens the SEC later deemed to be securities.<\/p>\n People close to Uniswap Labs told Fortune<\/em> the company is prepared to offer a \u201cworthy fight\u201d in court, and claimed the company\u2019s legitimacy is reflected in the fact it has chosen to operate in broad daylight in New York City rather than offshore.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\nDeFi platforms as self-driving cars<\/h2>\n
Subscribe to Fortune Crypto to get daily updates on the coins, companies, and people shaping the world of crypto. Sign up<\/a> for the newsletter for free.<\/div>\n