\n
![](\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/img-assets\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Yishan-Wong-Terraformation-1-e1712256172178.jpg?w=2048\")
<\/p>\n [ad_1]
\n<\/p>\n
Ten years ago, I left Big Tech. I\u2019d spent over a decade in Silicon Valley: first at PayPal<\/a>, then as a director of engineering at Facebook<\/a>, and finally serving as CEO of Reddit. Working in Big Tech can be exciting and exhilarating\u2014building products seen and used by millions, even billions of people. The challenges you are forced to grapple with often dwarf in scale the problems encountered in most other industries, and, as a result, veterans of the tech industry come away with unique skills and perspectives on big problems.<\/p>\n There is one arena, though, where the problems loom larger than even those contemplated by hyperscale tech, and that\u2019s planetary climate change. When it comes to climate, the variables are still too numerous for even our best computers to simulate. The number of stakeholders is literally everyone on the planet\u2014the largest possible TAM, or total addressable market. What this really means is that worldwide climate action is ultimately undertaken by cultures and communities everywhere, and the way people relate to it is myriad and diverse. Even the simplest-seeming solutions hide surprising complexity under the covers\u2014it is not just scientific, but also social.<\/p>\n When I began my first, naive attempts to restore a dryland forest on a parcel of land I\u2019d acquired, I began the journey of learning far more about the land, air, biology, energy, and earth systems than I thought possible. While it was exciting to immerse myself in multiple new fields of study, one key discipline from my days in Big Tech has proven to be uniquely valuable, and a source of consistent and useful insight. That discipline is scalability.<\/p>\n My years in tech had taught me to think in terms of scale. A social media site or a payment platform can\u2019t succeed if it breaks down when 10,000 or even 10 million new people decide to sign up. After calculating the carbon impact of restoring a single forest, I got curious about the impact of restoring every forest. I realized that, at scale, global reforestation had the potential for a significant impact on climate change\u2014to reduce our atmospheric carbon by 30%. Soon, I found that scientists halfway around the world had completed research that seems to point to the same conclusion.<\/p>\n That number becomes even more significant when you understand that carbon removal technologies like direct-air carbon capture are nowhere near ready to scale. They\u2019re years or even decades from that point. New technologies nearly always suffer from bugs and reliability issues. And we don\u2019t have time to wait. On the other hand, a new sapling begins removing carbon from the air the first day it\u2019s planted.<\/p>\n I love new tech as much as anyone else. But here is the key lesson, the most counterintuitive one, hard-won through sweat and tears working in a hyperscale tech company: To solve a hyperscale problem, you always avoid new tech. It\u2019s best to use reliable, older-generation equipment that will require minimal troubleshooting and bring the fewest surprises.\u00a0<\/p>\n That\u2019s why trees are a great solution for sequestering carbon. We know the benefits and the risks, and they\u2019re accessible to everyone, not just the wealthiest nations. Everyone can participate, and while there are plenty of unknowns and there will be many missteps, all of those problems can be more easily researched and solved if we\u2019re starting from a basic idea that\u2019s easy to understand: a tree.<\/p>\n Planting lots of trees sounds simple, but mass reforestation is a wholly different type of project\u2014one that calls for a high level of expertise and resources. Financing is a major bottleneck. Seeds for dozens of different species must be collected and prepared. Water must be made available. Teams must be trained and ready to overcome unique challenges. And because forests are highly interdependent systems, we have to solve them all holistically.<\/p>\n In 2022, my company Terraformation launched the Seed to Carbon Forest Accelerator<\/a>, a program modeled on startup accelerators like Y Combinator. It provides wraparound support for early-stage forestry teams and helps investors access high-quality carbon credits. In over a year, we\u2019ve launched three cohorts of forestry teams aiming to reforest land in some of the world\u2019s most biodiverse and climate-critical areas\u2014and we\u2019re launching a fourth cohort soon. We\u2019ve taken reforestation projects from conception to carbon-project registration in roughly 12 to 18 months, among the fastest of any such projects. And there are more to come.<\/p>\n Climate change is the greatest challenge of our time. Every year the need to take meaningful action becomes more and more urgent. It is our intention to do work that our grandchildren and their children will be proud of. That is why, at Terraformation, one of our company values serves as a daily reminder of why we do this work: \u201cWe are ancestors.\u201d<\/p>\n Yishan Wong is the founder and CEO of Terraformation<\/a>, a global reforestation company.<\/em><\/p>\n The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of\u00a0<\/em>Fortune.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\nReady to scale<\/h2>\n
Forestry accelerator<\/h2>\n
More must-read\u00a0commentary\u00a0published by\u00a0Fortune<\/em>:<\/h2>\n
Subscribe to the new Fortune CEO Weekly Europe newsletter to get corner office insights on the biggest business stories in Europe. Sign up<\/a> for free.<\/div>\n