After a lengthy legal dispute, London\u2019s High Court of Justice has formally determined that Australian computer scientist Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin.<\/p>\n One of the great mysteries of the Bitcoin community since its inception has been quite related to the inception itself: who is Satoshi Nakamoto? This pseudonym is all we have to go on for the identity of that developer or developers who created Bitcoin: writing its white paper<\/a>, mining the Genesis Block, carrying out transactions, and correspondence with persons in the pre-Bitcoin cryptographic community. And yet, when Bitcoin began receiving the tiniest bits of recognition from the broader world, he formally relinquished any authority over Bitcoin as a project and vanished<\/a>. In the years since, there have been many attempts to determine Satoshi\u2019s identity, but nothing has borne fruit. <\/p>\n However, members of the community have not only tried to unmask Satoshi from an outsider\u2019s perspective. There have additionally been efforts from various people to publicly claim that they, in fact, are the true creators of Bitcoin. A particular standout in this respect has been the software developer Craig Wright, who made this bold statement in 2016 and has faced years<\/a> of ridicule from prominent members of the Bitcoin community. Although Wright has fought back against his detractors through litigious<\/a> action, he has faced repeated<\/a> defeats<\/a> on this front. Still, the threat of libel suits has been an ongoing specter over media coverage of Wright\u2019s 8-year claim, and many of his actions have gone underreported as a result. <\/p>\n Eventually, this stifling atmosphere led the Cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance (COPA) to take a bold step in 2021 when it sued<\/a> him in British courts to obtain a ruling over whether Wright has copyright ownership of Bitcoin\u2019s white paper. This legal battle has not surfaced much in public discourse since this first filing, for understandable reasons, even as British courts ruled<\/a> against Wright\u2019s Satoshi claims in suits unrelated to COPA. Although settlement<\/a> options were pitched by Wright\u2019s legal team, ultimately COPA refused all of them, under the logic that such a settlement would require tacitly accepting his claim. If Craig Wright was only a fraud, after all, he would have no power to offer any concessions on the nature of Bitcoin\u2019s ownership. After years of an apparent holding pattern, the trial began<\/a> in February 2024.<\/p>\n A particularly noteworthy tactic<\/a> used by Wright\u2019s team \u201crepeatedly\u201d was that, if Wright was not truly Satoshi Nakamoto, then the real Satoshi would have to unmask himself to disprove the claim definitively. More than anything else, this particular claim has unearthed a large volume of interest in Satoshi\u2019s true identity. For example, as the trial was approaching in January 2024, nearly $1 million worth of Bitcoin was transferred<\/a> into Satoshi\u2019s wallet from an anonymous source, arousing coverage from major media sites that Bitcoin\u2019s creator might reveal himself. The hubbub from this event led to rampant speculation<\/a>, as image macros began circulating claiming that characters from the two simplified Japanese scripts, katakana and hiragana, would be pronounced as \u201cSatoshi Nakamoto\u201d while resembling the English letters to the name of popular Satoshi candidate Hal Finney.<\/p>\n Even if Bitcoin was created by enthusiasts in the codebreaking and cryptography scene, this claim is somewhat dubious, as it would require mixing and matching two different Japanese scripts in a haphazard manner. For example, the syllable \u201cto\u201d in Satoshi is a different alphabet than the same syllable in Nakamoto, and there seems to be no steady rule for when these two writing systems alternate. Still, Hal Finney has been dead since 2014, which would explain why Satoshi has remained silent as Bitcoin blossomed to the extreme extent it has in the last ten years. <\/p>\n If nothing else, renewed speculation of this nature was a clear sign that the trial had captured Bitcoiners\u2019 collective imagination on the subject. It was a major point of interest then, when multiple early developers<\/a> and Bitcoin collaborators<\/a> began submitting private correspondence with Satoshi into the public record to be used as evidence. Adam Back, developer of the 90s \u201cHashcash\u201d protocol that directly inspired Bitcoin\u2019s mining algorithm, revealed a brief email correspondence initiated by Satoshi where the two discussed Hashcash\u2019s relevance to Bitcoin. Early collaborator Martii \u201cSirius\u201d Malmi, on the other hand, released a much larger tranche of emails on a broad range of looser topics, totaling 120 pages in all. These emails gave new insight into the personality of Bitcoin\u2019s creator and likely would never have surfaced without the criminal proceedings.<\/p>\n In any event, as soon as the proceedings had concluded, Justice James Mallor cited<\/a> the \u201coverwhelming evidence\u201d as he made an immediate ruling against Wright\u2019s claims. COPA released<\/a> some of the evidence against Wright independently, including the particularly damning accusation that Wright has used ChatGPT to forge documents \u201con an industrial scale.” Their legal team accused Wright of a \u201cmassive campaign of dishonesty and forgery\u201d that \u201cstray[ed] into farce,” going so far as to claim that Wright was actively fabricating new documents during the course of the five-week trial. Mallor claimed he would give a more detailed account of his reasons at a later date, but the actual verdict is clear: Craig Wright is not Satoshi, is not the author of the white paper, and did not create Bitcoin or its software. <\/p>\n![](\"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/.image\/c_fit%2Ch_800%2Cw_1200\/MjAxMjU3OTE4Njk0MTcyMTYx\/mtg5njayntyzmtmymjm2ode4.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n![](\"https:\/\/bitcoinmagazine.com\/.image\/c_fit%2Ch_800%2Cw_1200\/MjA1MTA1NjU5MDk4NzAzNDky\/d7d968cf-7d66-4614-a8f4-1533c917c6bc_750x500.jpg\")