![\"\"](\"https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/14115647\/SEI_195969943.jpg?width=1200\")
<\/div>Pythons are farmed for meat in South-East Asia<\/p>\n
Dan Natusch<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n
What kind of meat is the most sustainable? According to a study of farms in Thailand and Vietnam that raise snakes for meat, it might be pythons.<\/p>\n
When it comes to the efficiency of converting food into meat, snakes come out top, says Daniel Natusch<\/a> at consulting firm EPIC Biodiversity. \u201cNo other livestock species studied to date possesses the same credentials or rates of production as pythons.\u201d<\/p>\n Snakes have long been farmed on a small scale to produce specialist products, such as venom<\/a>. Only recently have they begun to be raised primarily for meat.<\/p>\n Natusch\u2019s team measured the growth of nearly 5000 reticulated and Burmese pythons (Malayopython reticulatus<\/em> and Python bivittatus<\/em>) over a year, along with what they were fed, plus the weight of their dressed carcasses \u2013 that is minus the skin, internal organs, head and tail. This was then compared with existing data on other animals.<\/p>\n According to the study, the dry mass of the food the pythons were fed was 1.2 times that of the dressed carcass, compared with 1.5 for salmon, 2.1 for crickets, 2.8 for poultry, 6 for pigs and 10 for beef.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The dry mass of the protein fed to the snakes was 2.4 times that in a snake carcass, compared with 3 for salmon, 10 for crickets, 21 for poultry, 38 for pigs and 83 for beef.<\/p>\n However, calculating how much food is converted into meat is notoriously tricky, says\u00a0Kajsa Resare Sahlin<\/a> at the Stockholm Resilience Centre in Sweden. It is also essential to take account of what protein animals are eating and where it comes from, she says.<\/p>\n A key thing\u00a0missing from the\u00a0study\u2019s\u00a0comparison is the fact that as carnivores, snakes are eating animals that\u00a0ate plants<\/a>, whereas other farm animals eat mostly plants. If the total mass of plant material required per kilogram of carcass was compared, snakes might not look nearly so efficient.<\/p>\n Asked about this, Natusch says that what makes snake meat sustainable isn\u2019t the efficiency of food conversion, but the fact that they are fed on waste meat, such as trapped rodents and stillborn pigs. This is made into sausages that the snakes eat.<\/p>\n \u201cLivestock fed on plant protein sourced from a crop monoculture where a natural habitat once stood\u2026 is far less sustainable than capturing rodent pests or using waste protein to feed pythons,\u201d says Natusch.<\/p>\n In fact, for this reason, he thinks snake meat is more sustainable than many plant-based foods. \u201cFor the vegans out there, in my experience, there would likely be more animals suffering from sowing crops into the soil each year than are killed to feed a python.\u201d<\/p>\n If the snakes are being fed waste that wasn\u2019t being used for other purposes, this would be an efficient use of resources, Resare Sahlin says. But wild rodents could refer to a number of species.<\/p>\n \u201cIf these are rats, then in the short term it could be beneficial to use them, but if a whole industry develops around this as a feed source, it will create perverse incentives to maintain \u2018rat problems\u2019 \u2013 and the implications for local communities could of course be vast,\u201d she says.<\/p>\n So even though snake meat as it is currently produced might be more sustainable than many other types of meat, this study doesn\u2019t show that it is inherently more sustainable.<\/p>\n But Natusch makes two other arguments in favour of snake farming. The first is food security. Many of the snakes chose to go for periods of up to 127 days without eating, yet lost just a few percentage points of body mass at most.<\/p>\n