{"id":211888,"date":"2024-03-10T16:46:23","date_gmt":"2024-03-10T16:46:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/2024\/03\/10\/the-companys-best-aps-c-camera-yet\/"},"modified":"2025-06-25T17:20:54","modified_gmt":"2025-06-25T17:20:54","slug":"the-companys-best-aps-c-camera-yet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/2024\/03\/10\/the-companys-best-aps-c-camera-yet\/","title":{"rendered":"The company\u2019s best APS-C camera yet"},"content":{"rendered":"

[ad_1]
\n<\/p>\n

\n

Sony is so closely associated with full-frame mirrorless cameras that it\u2019s easy to forget it also sells the A6000 APS-C lineup \u2014 particularly since the last one, the A6600<\/a>, came out five long years ago in 2019. The flagship A6700 finally arrived last year<\/a>, though, with a feature list that appeared to be worth the wait.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s the same price the A6600 was at launch four years ago, but addresses its predecessor\u2019s main flaws by boosting resolution a bit and reducing rolling shutter. At the same time, it\u2019s been likened to a mini-FX30 cinema camera as it has the same sensor and video capabilities.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve never been a big fan of Sony\u2019s A6000 series. But now that the A6700 has been out a while, I was keen to see if it lived up to some of the hype and how it compared to rival Canon and Fujifilm models. As you\u2019ll see, it\u2019s mostly good news with just a little bit of bad.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
\n