{"id":209161,"date":"2024-03-01T01:39:27","date_gmt":"2024-03-01T01:39:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/2024\/03\/01\/children-of-the-twenty-first-century\/"},"modified":"2025-06-25T17:21:25","modified_gmt":"2025-06-25T17:21:25","slug":"children-of-the-twenty-first-century","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/2024\/03\/01\/children-of-the-twenty-first-century\/","title":{"rendered":"Children of the twenty-first century"},"content":{"rendered":"

[ad_1]
\n<\/p>\n

\n

\u2018Although the future belongs to the young, future thinking \u2026 is more the domain of older people,\u2019 wrote Andrzej Sici\u0144ski.<\/span> The sociologist\u2019s provocative statement follows the study he and a team of researchers conducted on young people\u2019s visions of the future in Poland during the second half of the 1960s. The then 44-year-old researcher had become curious when he noticed that young people in 1960s Poland seemed increasingly interested in their own future, and that of their country and the world.<\/span><\/p>\n

Youth in Poland in the 1960s<\/h2>\n

Being young in Poland during the 1960s meant coming of age in a highly ambivalent decade. In the history of the Polish People\u2019s Republic, it is remembered, on the one hand, as a period of <\/span>ma\u0142a stabilizacja <\/span><\/i>(small stabilization) with moderate yet constant rates of economic growth, mostly satisfying basic consumer needs, housing and healthcare. Many Poles aligned with the socialist political system, which was still governed by strict authoritarian state-control over social, cultural and economic life. The Communist party was demanding less ideological commitment from Poles than in previous decades, trying to win their support instead through strong nationalist rhetoric and a less aggressive stance towards the Catholic Church.<\/span><\/p>\n

The decade was simultaneously a period of change for young Poles, in keeping with their peers in the East and the West.<\/span> The World Festival of Youth and Students in Warsaw in 1955 had been a formative experience for a whole generation of Poles: around thirty-thousand foreigners, also from the West, were invited to their capital to encounter the qualities of communist life. But the festival also opened the eyes of Polish youth and is considered one of the catalysts of political change that led to the moderate opening of the repressive state socialist regime.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

Newly gained economic stability and a relatively peaceful international political environment led the socialist regime to a moderate cultural and scientific opening to the West. Television became a true mass medium. Sociologists noted the emergence of popular mass culture alongside new, diverse lifestyles. Young Poles, through the role models, leisure activities, fashion, tourist destinations, or consumer aspirations they revered and pursued, increasingly defined themselves in relation to global youth culture.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Earth and Mars combined. Illustration by ultrasoftproduction via Wikimedia Commons.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Moreover, new scientific and technological developments such as computers, space travel and nuclear energy were expected to transform society via automatized and informatized production. From 1961 onwards the Soviet Union and its satellite states officially considered the so called \u2018scientific-technical revolution\u2019 the necessary precondition for furthering communism. The political regime\u2019s highest echelons, who held the vision of this \u2018one and only future\u2019, tasked scientists and technological experts to develop scientific predictions and holistic approaches.<\/span> In the second half of the 1960s, social scientists, journalists and writers engaged with what Sici\u0144ski called a global \u2018explosion of futurology\u2019<\/span> \u2013 in other words, controversies over new scientific tools of predictions and complex future-thinking, which experts and institutions in the US and western Europe had been developing since the early 1950s.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Imagining the year 2000<\/h2>\n

From 1967 to 1968, Sici\u0144ski and his team at the Polish Academy of Sciences conducted a sociological survey on youngsters\u2019 visions of the future. Their research started from an observation that young Poles were \u2018discovering\u2019 the future as a \u2018new dimension of thinking\u2019.<\/span> With a questionnaire and a representative sample of nearly 1,000 respondents, the researchers tried to capture young Poles\u2019 thoughts and predictions for the year 2000.<\/span><\/p>\n

When asked about their expectations for Poland\u2019s social structure, 21% of the respondents said that they expected social disparities to increase, while 24% awaited their stagnation, and 41% their decrease. The desired outcome differed remarkably, however: 73% of young Poles hoped that social disparities would diminish by the year 2000. Only 8% hoped they would increase. While support for socialism\u2019s major promise of equal distribution of social and economic resources appeared to have been strong, trust in the system\u2019s ability to deliver seemed to be much lower. The overall vision of Poland 2000 was of a more urbanized, equal country with more women and young people in decision-making positions, a strongly automatized economy and a satisfied population.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Asked about their visions of the international situation in 2000, young Poles in 1968 were convinced that the divide between socialism and capitalism would still be the dominant line of conflict. Only 8% could imagine that such differences would vanish. 29% imagined a peaceful coexistence, while nearly half of the respondents either expected \u2018serious tensions\u2019 or military conflict.<\/span><\/p>\n

The results suggest that young people in 1968 Poland had a vision of the future that was very much in line with official state propaganda. The questionnaires had been through political censorship, omitting sensitive topics, and it cannot be verified whether respondents feared consequences if answering one way or the other.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Future-thinking in 1968\/9<\/h2>\n

The authors of the survey did not aim to predict what the year 2000 would look like. Their research had a diagnostic instead of a prognostic goal, which they explained as \u2018learning more about how the future enters young people\u2019s minds\u2019.<\/span> What shaped their future-thinking today, was what sociologists wanted to find out. The study was part of an international project comparing the attitudes of young people from ten different countries, spanning various political and geographical locations. The sociologists noticed a strong tendency to envision a common, global future. However, they rejected the widespread interpretation that conflict with older generations united all the political protests and clashes between young people and state forces that were sweeping the world in 1968, including those in Warsaw and Prague. In other words, the sociological study could be used to support a common narrative of ruling elites from the older generations, namely that only a minor, negligible fraction of \u2018radicals\u2019 was on the barricades.<\/span><\/p>\n

However, the authors pointed towards another, arguably more fundamental subversion of the official communist ideology. They had used a macro-sociological approach which turned answers into numbers, comparing and correlating responses with each other and features such as class, nationality and gender. In combination with Marxist theory, they had expected socio-economic factors to explain differences in young peoples\u2019 perceptions of the future. However, Sici\u0144ski argued that the true determinants of young people\u2019s visions remained undiscovered because the \u2018microsocial\u2019 had been left out of the picture<\/span>.<\/span> He suspected future-thinking to emerge from the social and psychological dynamics of small groups, informal networks, from individual voices and emotions. Intentionally or not, this conclusion questioned a fundamental premise of socialist and, more generally, twentieth century politics \u2013 namely that young people\u2019s future-thinking was primarily shaped by state and collective practices channelled through mainstream political organizations or state-organized education. Besides, the researchers had shown that although everyone had been asked for their visions in 1968, 2000 was not equally close nor distant to everyone. The ship of socialist society was no longer progressing at a single steady pace through historical time towards the dock of a communist future.<\/span><\/p>\n

Pipelines into the future<\/h2>\n

Nevertheless, the sociologists\u2019 hope in 1968 was that mass media, education and scholarly works, such as theirs, would lead the young to think of the future even more often. And they were not alone in observing and trying to influence the discovery of the future by young Poles. In 1969 the weekly publication <\/span>Perspektywy<\/span><\/i> (Perspectives) was established to cover a wide range of topics from international politics to social and cultural affairs, sports and technological developments. Its goal was also to shape readers\u2019 perspectives on the future \u2013 to make them think \u2018futurologically\u2019.\u00a0 In the first issue in September 1969, the editor-in-chief argued that young Poles were indeed \u2018Children of the Third Millennium\u2019, who should be guided by \u2018rational\u2019 and scientific future-thinking in preparation for their adult responsibility for socialist Poland.<\/span> For two years the magazine devoted a weekly two-page essay with \u2018perspectives on the twenty-first century\u2019 to this programmatic goal. In retrospect, it provides an interesting window on the visions which shaped how young people in Poland imagined the next century at the turn of the 1960s and 1970s.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

These essays discussed ground-breaking technological and scientific developments and their social consequences, questioning whether and when they would become possible. Answers were loaded with optimism. For instance, humans settling on the moon in the first half of the twenty-first century was presented as highly possible. It was thought that technological progress combined with social scientific expertise would have far-reaching, positive impacts on everyday life, economic behaviour, nature and international politics \u2013 and prevent undesirable outcomes.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

However, readers were not expected to have blind faith in technological solutions for social problems. On the contrary, the authors, who were renowned scientists and journalists from Poland, rejected \u2018passive acceptance\u2019 of new technologies, encouraging the \u2018realization of individual mental and physical interests\u2019 instead.<\/span> Usually, they presented the future as an open question, describing \u2013 not without signs of humour \u2013 various positive and negative scenarios. Presenting scientific and technological progress as ambivalent and calling for its submission to individual and social creativity, implicitly challenged the idea that more advanced technology would lead straight towards the victory of communism.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nevertheless, trust in techno-utopian feasibility prevailed in most essays. Writers trusted that the scientific and planned development of socialism would be the best guarantee for a \u2018humanistic\u2019 use of technology not driven by commercial benefits. They heralded computers as \u2018the brains of humankind\u2019 that would not only take more \u2018rational\u2019 economic decisions but also make government less bureaucratic and more transparent and democratic. Finally, the essays conveyed a strong sense that historical progress could be guided by scientific and technological reason and respective political action. The underlying notion of the present and the future being connected by a more or less continuous line of progression is displayed, for example, by the title of an essay, which discussed the prospects and issues with constructing submarine tunnels between different continents for long-distance train travel: the tunnels were described as \u2018pipelines running into the future\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n

However, those pipelines did not exist yet. In other words, the future was rather distant and disconnected than easy to grasp. To finish its biannual series of essays on the twenty-first century, the weekly organized an expert survey among 20 prominent Polish scientists. Adapting the Delphi technique, a method for gathering expert knowledge developed by a US Think Tank in the early 1950s, the editors asked them questions like: when did they expect the first human to land on Mars; if and when would socialism supersede market-based capitalist systems; when would humans be capable of preventing natural events such as earthquakes and hurricanes. Although the organizers of the survey wrote that it was more of a \u2018futurological game\u2019, they trusted that it would nevertheless contain \u2018important findings for tomorrow\u2019.<\/span> According to the collected Polish expert opinions, 2050 was the date by which both humans would travel to Mars, and socialism would have proven superior to capitalism in efficiently delivering social and economic prosperity. Control over earthquakes and extreme weather events was anticipated even sooner, to be already mastered by the year 2000.<\/span><\/p>\n

History of the future<\/h2>\n

Even if, in retrospect, the predictions of young Poles from the late 1960s for the year 2000 seem flawed, they may have played an important role at the time in shaping world views, social communication and political action. Both the outlined sociological study and weekly publication capture elements and limitations of historical \u2018horizons of expectation\u2019, which are relevant to more than historians. <\/span><\/p>\n

Looking at past futures can equip us with greater awareness for the origins of today\u2019s future-thinking. Whether Polish sociologists\u2019 discovery of the microsocial roots of future-thinking already pointed towards a more fundamental transformation of modern industrial societies, whose collective solidarities gave way to more flexible, particularistic orientations, visible in today\u2019s social media and informational bubbles, would require further inquiry. As the course of history evolves, one sometimes forgets that the past had many possible imagined futures, including the ones considered by young Poles in their engagement with sociological research or futurological \u2018perspectives\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n

Investigating the \u2018children of the twenty-first century\u2019 of the 1960s raises questions about today\u2019s future-thinking: how are visions of the future constructed; how do they gain credibility; which emotions and actions do they encourage or dissuade; which political agendas are they related to, and whose visions are they. \u2018Futures literacy\u2019, propagated as an important competence in current times of social and environmental transformation, would encompass a critical historical consciousness of the future\u2019s multiple pasts.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

This article has been published as part of the youth project\u00a0<\/em>Vom Wissen der Jungen. Wissenschaftskommunikation mit jungen Erwachsenen in Kriegszeiten, funded by the City of Vienna, Cultural Affairs.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

[ad_2]
\n
Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[ad_1] \u2018Although the future belongs to the young, future thinking \u2026 is more the domain of older people,\u2019 wrote Andrzej Sici\u0144ski. The sociologist\u2019s provocative statement<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":209162,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[154],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209161"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209161"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209161\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":341154,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209161\/revisions\/341154"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/209162"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michigandigitalnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}